Sign In
Sign In

K3s vs K8s: Key Differences and Use Cases

K3s vs K8s: Key Differences and Use Cases
Hostman Team
Technical writer
Infrastructure

As a popular orchestration container tool, Kubernetes (K8s) powers over 90% of global workloads, making it an important instrument in infrastructure development. However, its complexity and resource consumption aren't always good—especially for lightweight environments. That’s where K3s comes in, offering a streamlined alternative. 

In this guide we compare K3s and K8s, helping you choose the right fit for your use case—whether it's enterprise-scale deployments or low-footprint edge clusters.

Key Takeaways

  • K3s keeps it light. If you're working with limited resources—like a Raspberry Pi, old device, or just need something quick for testing—K3s is your friend. It's super easy to install, doesn't eat up much memory.

  • K8s brings the muscle. When you’re dealing with more complex systems that need to scale reliably across multiple nodes and stay highly available, standard Kubernetes (K8s) is built for that.

  • What’s the real difference? K3s is all about simplicity and speed. K8s is all about power and control. They both run Kubernetes under the hood—it’s just a matter of how much you need to customize and scale.

What is K8s?

K8s is short for Kubernetes. It is a widely used option in professional production environments for managing microservices-based and large-scale containerized workloads. Originally developed by Google and now maintained by the CNCF

Standard Kubernetes is a modular tool and needs some manual touches, before getting deployed, such as the API server, scheduler, controller manager, etc. While this architecture provides powerful control and flexibility, it also adds significant operational complexity.

K8s is an ideal instrument for big  teams with DevOps pipelines, and the resources to manage and maintain grand infrastructure. Let’s not forget that, K8s fully integrates well with cloud providers like AWS (via EKS), Google Cloud (via GKE), and Azure (via AKS), and supports a broad ecosystem of extensions and third-party tools for monitoring, logging, service meshes, and more.

Image1

Kubernetes (K8s) working scheme

Advantages and Disadvantages of K8s

Advantages

  • Full documentation and community support: From Helm charts to service meshes, there’s a huge toolbox and community behind it.

  • Advanced features: Load balancing, autoscaling, RBAC, pod disruption budgets—you name it.

  • Cloud-native integrations: Easily integrates with major cloud providers and lets you build hybrid or multi-cloud setups.

  • Flexibility: You have control over every layer of your infrastructure.

Disadvantages

  • Complex setup and maintenance: Requires expertise to install, configure, and operate effectively.

  • Resource-hungry: Demands a minimum of 2 GB RAM per node for smooth operation.

  • Operational overhead: Requires active monitoring, frequent updates, and manual scaling strategies if not managed via cloud services.

  • Steep learning curve: Can be overwhelming for teams without prior Kubernetes experience.

What is K3s?

Now enter K3s—Kubernetes’ leaner cousin. Built by Rancher Labs and now maintained by SUSE, K3s is everything you love about Kubernetes—but packed into a smaller, easier-to-manage package. This one’s designed to provide a fully functional Kubernetes experience, but at the same time, it’s trying to reduce resource consumption, so your device won’t suffer from extensive workload.

K3s is a single binary—usually under 100MB—that includes the Kubernetes control plane, container runtime (containerd), networking (via Flannel), ingress (via Traefik), and even a Helm controller. Out of the box, it uses SQLite for the cluster datastore, but you can also connect it to MySQL, PostgreSQL, or etcd if you want HA.

By default, K3s uses SQLite as its datastore instead of etcd, although it can be configured to use MySQL, PostgreSQL, or external etcd clusters for enhanced high availability. It also includes:

  • containerd as the default container runtime

  • Flannel as the Container Network Interface (CNI)

  • Traefik as the default ingress controller

  • A built-in Helm controller for deploying charts

Group 1321314238

Kubernetes (K3s) working scheme explained

Advantages and Disadvantages of K3s

Advantages

  • Lightweight and efficient: Minimal resource consumption allows it to run on devices with as little as 512 MB RAM.

  • Quick setup: You can deploy a single-node cluster with a one-line install script.

  • Ideal for development and edge scenarios: Works well in places where full-scale Kubernetes would be excessive or impractical.

  • Lower operational burden: Fewer moving parts make it easier to maintain.

  • Full Kubernetes compatibility: Supports standard manifests, kubectl, Helm charts, and the Kubernetes API.

Disadvantages

  • Limited out-of-the-box HA: Full HA requires external database setup and additional configuration.

  • Security trade-offs: Some enterprise-grade features are disabled by default to conserve resources.

  • Smaller ecosystem: Though growing, K3s has fewer prebuilt integrations and community add-ons compared to standard Kubernetes.

  • Not intended for large, multi-tenant environments: Better suited for simpler or single-purpose deployments.

K8s vs K3s

Both K8s and K3s developed CNCF-certified Kubernetes distributions. However, despite almost common origin and almost the same purposes, these two tools have very different functions and target different environments. K8s (Kubernetes) is a more complex container orchestration platform designed for vast ecosystems with the possibility of extension, and very suitable for large teams. It provides full control over networking, security, and infrastructure integrations. Sounds like an ideal solution for big companies, doesn't it?

On the other hand, K3s is specifically engineered to be more available for less powerful machines, and overall easier to use. The thing is, K3s doesn’t need the operational complexity of Kubernetes that much. It is possible by consolidating components into a single binary and including sensible defaults like containerd, Flannel, and Traefik. 

Let’s not forget that, the main difference between K3s and K8s is not in capability—K3s supports the full Kubernetes API—but in setup, performance, and operating environment. If your team has a need for fast deployment and minimal headache, K3s is a strong candidate. For those managing large-scale, mission-critical systems with complex architectures, K8s is a better fit.

Here’s a quick comparison to summarize the key differences:

Feature

K8s (Kubernetes)

K3s

Purpose

Enterprise workloads, production-scale

Edge, IoT, dev/test, low-resource

Installation

Manual, multi-component setup

One-line install, single binary

Resource Requirements

2 GB+ RAM per node

512 MB RAM minimum

Datastore

etcd (required)

SQLite by default (etcd optional)

Control Plane Architecture

Multiple processes and services

Combined into a single binary

Add-ons

User-installed

Includes containerd, Flannel, Traefik

Multi-tenancy

Yes

Limited; designed for single-tenant

HA Support

Built-in

Requires external database

Best for

Complex, large-scale deployments

Light, fast, and simple setups

How to Choose the Right Option for Your Needs

Before you decide what’s best for you, K3s or Kubernetes, you need to understand your goals and what tools you have to make your plans real.

If you are willing to build a scalable application that requires high resource consumption like networking, multi-tenancy, and enterprise integrations, K8s is the better option. It excels in large production clusters with diverse workloads and complex operational requirements.

However, if you are:

  • Working with resource-constrained edge devices
  • Running CI/CD pipelines where clusters are created and destroyed quickly
  • Developing proof-of-concept projects
  • Managing a single-purpose application or internal tool

Then K3s will likely serve your needs better.

Both solutions are good and can even be used in your work together! For example, you can use K8s in production and K3s for development and testing environments. Pretty cool, right? 

Conclusion

Kubernetes is a great tool for your modern infrastructure, but you need to be careful in choosing the right option for you. Depending on your needs, K3s or K8s can offer distinct advantages. K3s provides a more simplified solution ideal for fast-moving teams or if you don't have access to hi-tech infrastructure. K8s, on the other hand, remains the only solution for enterprises and big companies that need more advanced capabilities.

If you’re interested in using Kubernetes, check Hostman’s Kubernetes Service—it’s cheap and pretty powerful.

FAQ

What is the main difference between K3s and Kubernetes (K8s)?

K3s is a lightweight version of Kubernetes, designed for resource-constrained devices, packaging all core components into a single binary. Kubernetes is a full-featured platform suited for large-scale enterprise deployments.

Is K3s a full Kubernetes distribution?  

Yes, K3s is certified by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation as a conformant Kubernetes distribution, fully supporting Kubernetes APIs and tools.

Can I use K3s in production?  

Definitely! K3s is used in production across various sectors for edge computing, IoT, local development clusters, and continuous integration.

What are the system requirements for K3s vs. K8s?  

K3s requires only 512 MB of RAM and one virtual CPU, ideal for low-power environments. In contrast, standard Kubernetes requires at least 2 GB of RAM and more resources for its control plane.

Can I migrate from K3s to full Kubernetes later? 

Yes, migration is straightforward due to API compatibility, though you should account for differences in configurations.

When should I choose K3s over Kubernetes?  

Choose K3s for low-resource settings, quick deployments, or edge scenarios. Opt for Kubernetes for high availability, scalability, and enterprise-grade features.

Infrastructure

Similar

Infrastructure

Apache Kafka and Real-Time Data Stream Processing

Apache Kafka is a high-performance server-based message broker capable of processing enormous volumes of events, measured in millions per second. Kafka's distinctive features include exceptional fault tolerance, the ability to store data for extended periods, and ease of infrastructure expansion through the simple addition of new nodes. The project's development began within LinkedIn, and in 2011, it was transferred to the Apache Software Foundation. Today, Kafka is widely used by leading global companies to build scalable, reliable data transmission infrastructure and has become the de facto industry standard for stream processing. Kafka solves a key problem: ensuring stable transmission and processing of streaming data between services in real time. As a distributed broker, it operates on a cluster of servers that simultaneously receive, store, and process messages. This architecture allows Kafka to achieve high throughput, maintain operability during failures, and ensure minimal latency even with many connected data sources. It also supports data replication and load distribution across partitions, making the system extremely resilient and scalable. Kafka is written in Scala and Java but supports clients in numerous languages, including Python, Go, C#, JavaScript, and others, allowing integration into virtually any modern infrastructure and use in projects of varying complexity and focus. How the Technology Works To work effectively with Kafka, you first need to understand its structure and core concepts. The system's main logic relies on the following components: Messages: Information enters Kafka as individual events, each representing a message. Topics: All messages are grouped by topics. A topic is a logical category or queue that unites data by a specific characteristic. Producers: These are programs or services that send messages to a specific topic. Producers are responsible for generating and transmitting data into the Kafka system. Consumers: Components that connect to a specific topic and extract published messages. To improve efficiency, consumers are often organized into consumer groups, thereby distributing the load among different instances and allowing better management of parallel processing of large data volumes. This division significantly improves overall system performance and reliability. Partitions: Any topic can be divided into partitions, enabling horizontal system scaling and increased performance. Brokers: Servers united in a Kafka cluster perform functions of storing, processing, and managing messages. The component interaction process looks as follows: The producer sends a message to a specified topic. The message is added to the end of one of the topic's partitions and receives its sequential number (offset). A consumer belonging to a specific group subscribes to the topic and reads messages from partitions assigned to it, starting from the required offset. Each consumer independently manages its offset, allowing messages to be re-read when necessary. Thus, Kafka acts as a powerful message delivery mechanism, ensuring high throughput, reliability, and fault tolerance. Since Kafka stores data as a distributed log, messages remain available for re-reading, unlike many queue-oriented systems. Key Principles Append-only log: messages are not modified/deleted (by default), they are simply added. This simplifies storage and replay. Partition division for speed: one topic is split into parts, and Kafka can process them in parallel. Thanks to this, it scales easily. Guaranteed order within partition: consumers read messages in the order they were written to the partition. However, there is no complete global ordering across the entire topic if there are multiple partitions. Messages can be re-read: a consumer can "rewind" at any time and re-read needed data if it's still stored in Kafka. Stable cluster operation: Kafka functions as a collection of servers capable of automatically redirecting load to backup nodes in case of broker failure. Why Major Companies Choose Apache Kafka There are several key reasons why large organizations choose Kafka: Scalability Kafka easily handles large data streams without losing performance. Thanks to the distributed architecture and message replication support, the system can be expanded simply by adding new brokers to the cluster. High Performance The system can process millions of messages per second even under high load. This level of performance is achieved through asynchronous data sending by producers and efficient reading mechanisms by consumers. Reliability and Resilience Message replication among multiple brokers ensures data safety even when part of the infrastructure fails. Messages are stored sequentially on disk for extended periods, minimizing the risk of their loss. Log Model and Data Replay Capability Unlike standard message queues where data disappears after reading, Kafka stores messages for the required period and allows their repeated reading. Ecosystem Support and Maturity Kafka has a broad ecosystem: it supports connectors (Kafka Connect), stream processing (Kafka Streams), and integrations with analytical and Big Data systems. Open Source Kafka is distributed under the free Apache license. This provides numerous advantages: a huge amount of official and unofficial documentation, tutorials, and reviews; a large number of third-party extensions and patches improving basic functionality; and the ability to flexibly adapt the system to specific project needs. Why Use Apache Kafka? Kafka is used where real-time data processing is necessary. The platform enables development of resilient and easily scalable architectures that efficiently process large volumes of information and maintain stable operation even under significant loads. Stream Data Processing When an application produces a large volume of messages in real time, Kafka ensures optimal management of such streams. The platform guarantees strict message delivery sequence and the ability to reprocess them, which is a key factor for implementing complex business processes. System Integration For connecting multiple heterogeneous services and applications, Kafka serves as a universal intermediary, allowing data transmission between them. This simplifies building microservice architecture, where each component can independently work with event streams while remaining synchronized with others. Data Collection and Transmission for Monitoring Kafka enables centralized collection of logs, metrics, and events from various sources, which are then analyzed by monitoring and visualization tools. This facilitates problem detection, system state control, and real-time reporting. Real-Time Data Processing Through integration with stream analytics systems (such as Spark, Flink, Kafka Streams), Kafka enables creation of solutions for operational analysis and rapid response to incoming data. This allows for timely informed decision-making, formation of interactive monitoring dashboards, and instant response to emerging events, which is critically important for applications in finance, marketing, and Internet of Things (IoT). Real-Time Data Analysis Through interaction with stream analytics tools (for example, Spark, Flink, Kafka Streams), Kafka becomes the foundation for developing solutions ensuring fast processing and analysis of incoming data. This functionality enables timely important management decisions, visualization of indicators in convenient interactive dashboards, and instant response to changing situations, which is extremely relevant for financial sector companies, marketers, and IoT solution developers. Use Case Examples Here are several possible application scenarios: Web platforms: any user action (view, click, like) is sent to Kafka, and then these events are processed by analytics, recommendation system, or notification service. Fintech: a transaction creates a "payment completed" event, which the anti-fraud service immediately receives. If suspicious, it can initiate a block and pass data further. IoT devices: thousands of sensors send readings (temperature, humidity) to Kafka, where they are processed by streaming algorithms (for example, for anomaly detection), and then notifications are sent to operators. Microservices: services exchange events ("order created," "item packed," etc.) through Kafka without calling each other directly. Log aggregation: multiple services send logs to Kafka, from where analytics systems, SIEM, or centralized processing systems retrieve them. Logistics: tracking delivery statuses or real-time route distribution. Advertising: collection and analysis of user events for personalization and marketing analytics. These examples demonstrate Kafka's flexibility and its application in various areas. When Kafka Is Not Suitable It's important to understand the limitations and situations when Kafka is not the optimal choice. Several points: If the data volume is small (for example, several thousand messages per day) and the system is simple, implementing Kafka may be excessive. For low traffic, simple queues like RabbitMQ are better. If you need to make complex queries with table joins, aggregations, or store data for very long periods with arbitrary access, it's better to use a regular database. If full ACID transactions are important (for example, for banking operations with guaranteed integrity and relationships between tables), Kafka doesn't replace a regular database. If data hardly changes and doesn't need to be quickly transmitted between systems, Kafka will be excessive. Simple storage in a database or file may be sufficient. Kafka's Differences from Traditional Databases Traditional databases (SQL and NoSQL) are oriented toward storing structured information and performing fast retrieval operations. Their architecture is optimized for reliable data storage and efficient extraction of specific records on demand. In turn, Kafka is designed to solve different tasks: Working with streaming data: Kafka focuses on managing continuous data streams, while traditional database management systems are designed primarily for processing static information arrays. Parallelism and scaling: Kafka scales horizontally through partitions and brokers, and is designed for very large stream data volumes. Databases (especially relational) often scale vertically or with horizontal scaling limitations. Ordering and stream: Kafka guarantees order within a partition and allows subscribers to read from different positions, jump back, and replay. Latency and throughput: Kafka is designed to provide minimal delays while simultaneously processing enormous volumes of events. Example Simple Python Application for Working with Kafka If Kafka is not yet installed, the easiest way to "experiment" with it is to install it via Docker. For this, it's sufficient to create a docker-compose.yml file with minimal configuration: version: "3" services: broker: image: apache/kafka:latest container_name: broker ports: - "9092:9092" environment: KAFKA_NODE_ID: 1 KAFKA_PROCESS_ROLES: broker,controller KAFKA_LISTENERS: PLAINTEXT://0.0.0.0:9092,CONTROLLER://0.0.0.0:9093 KAFKA_ADVERTISED_LISTENERS: PLAINTEXT://localhost:9092 KAFKA_CONTROLLER_LISTENER_NAMES: CONTROLLER KAFKA_LISTENER_SECURITY_PROTOCOL_MAP: CONTROLLER:PLAINTEXT,PLAINTEXT:PLAINTEXT KAFKA_CONTROLLER_QUORUM_VOTERS: 1@localhost:9093 KAFKA_OFFSETS_TOPIC_REPLICATION_FACTOR: 1 KAFKA_TRANSACTION_STATE_LOG_REPLICATION_FACTOR: 1 KAFKA_TRANSACTION_STATE_LOG_MIN_ISR: 1 KAFKA_GROUP_INITIAL_REBALANCE_DELAY_MS: 0 KAFKA_NUM_PARTITIONS: 3 Run: docker compose up -d Running Kafka in the Cloud In addition to local deployment via Docker, Kafka can be run in the cloud. This eliminates unnecessary complexity and saves time. In Hostman, you can create a ready Kafka instance in just a few minutes: simply choose the region and configuration, and the installation and setup happen automatically. The cloud platform provides high performance, stability, and technical support, so you can focus on development and growth of your project without being distracted by infrastructure. Try Hostman and experience the convenience of working with reliable and fast cloud hosting. Python Scripts for Demonstration Below are examples of Producer and Consumer in Python (using the kafka-python library), the first script writes messages to a topic and the other reads. First, install the Python library: pip install kafka-python producer.py This code sends five messages to the test-topic theme. from kafka import KafkaProducer import json import time # Create Kafka producer and specify broker address # value_serializer converts Python objects to JSON bytes producer = KafkaProducer( bootstrap_servers="localhost:9092", value_serializer=lambda v: json.dumps(v).encode("utf-8"), ) # Send 5 messages in succession for i in range(5): data = {"Message": i} # Form data producer.send("test-topic", data) # Asynchronous send to Kafka print(f"Sent: {data}") # Log to console time.sleep(1) # Pause 1 second between sends # Wait for all messages to be sent producer.flush() consumer.py This Consumer reads messages from the theme, starting from the beginning. from kafka import KafkaConsumer import json # Create Kafka Consumer and subscribe to "test-topic" consumer = KafkaConsumer( "test-topic", # Topic we're listening to bootstrap_servers="localhost:9092", # Kafka broker address auto_offset_reset="earliest", # Read messages from the very beginning if no saved offset group_id="test-group", # Consumer group (for balancing) value_deserializer=lambda v: json.loads(v.decode("utf-8")), # Convert bytes back to JSON ) print("Waiting for messages...") # Infinite loop—listen to topic and process messages for message in consumer: print("Received:", message.value) # Output message content These two small scripts demonstrate basic operations with Kafka: publishing and receiving messages. Conclusion Apache Kafka is an effective tool for building architectures where key factors are event processing, streaming data, high performance, fault tolerance, and latency minimization. It is not a universal replacement for databases but excellently complements them in scenarios where classic solutions cannot cope. With proper architecture, Kafka enables building flexible, responsive systems. When choosing Kafka, it's important to evaluate requirements: data volume, speed, architecture, integrations, ability to manage the cluster. If the system is simple and loads are small—perhaps it's easier to choose a simpler tool. But if the load is large, events flow continuously, and a scalable solution is required, Kafka can become the foundation. Despite certain complexity in setup and maintenance, Kafka has proven its effectiveness in numerous large projects where high speed, reliability, and working with event streams are important.
08 December 2025 · 12 min to read
Infrastructure

VMware Cloud Director: What It Is and How to Use It

VMware Cloud Director (formerly vCloud Director, or “vCD”) is a modern solution for cloud providers, mainly designed for building virtual data centers on top of physical infrastructure. The platform allows combining all of a data center’s physical resources into virtual pools, which are then offered to end users on a rental basis. It integrates tightly with VMware’s own technologies: vCenter and vSphere. vCenter is a set of tools for managing virtual infrastructure, and vSphere is the virtualization platform for cloud computing. Key Capabilities of VMware Cloud Director Creation of virtual data centers (vDCs) with full isolation of virtual services and resources. Migration of virtual machines (VMs) between clouds, and self-deployment of OVF templates. Snapshots and rollback of VM changes. Creation of isolated and routable networks with external access. Integrated, tiered storage with load balancing between virtual machines. Network security: perimeter protection and firewalling. Encryption of access to cloud resources to secure the virtual infrastructure. Unified authentication across all VMware services (single sign-on) so users don’t need to re-authenticate. Deployment of multi‑tier applications as ready-made virtual appliances, with VMs and OS images. Allocation of isolated resources for different departments within a single virtual structure. How VMware Cloud Director Works VMware Cloud Director uses a multi-tenant model. Rather than building a dedicated environment for every customer, it creates a shared virtual environment. This reduces infrastructure maintenance costs massively: for large cloud providers, savings can reach hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars per year, which in turn lowers the rental cost for end users. Resource consumption model: Using vCenter and vSphere, the provider aggregates physical resources into a shared pool called a “virtual data center” (vDC). From that pool, resources are allocated into Org vDCs (Organizational Virtual Data Centers), which are the fundamental compute units consumed by customers. VMware Cloud Director syncs with the vSphere database to request and allocate the required amount of resources. Org vDCs are containers of VMs and can be configured independently. Customers can order different numbers of Org vDCs for different purposes, e.g., one Org vDC for marketing, another for finance, a third for HR. At the same time, interconnectivity can be established between these Org vDCs, forming a large, virtual private data center. It’s also possible to combine Org vDCs into multiple networks. Additionally, within those networks, one can create vApps (virtual applications) made up of VMs, each with their own gateways to connect to Org vDCs. This setup allows building virtual networks of any architecture, isolated or routable, to match various business needs. When such a network is created, the provider assigns a user from the customer organization to the role of network administrator. A unique URL is also assigned to each organization. The administrator is responsible for adding or removing users, assigning roles and resources, creating network services, and more. They also manage connections to services provided by the cloud provider. For instance, VM templates or OVF/OVA modules, which simplify backup and VM migration. Resource Allocation Models in VMware Cloud Director VMware Cloud Director supports several models for allocating resources, depending on how you want to manage usage: Allocation Pool: You set resource limits and also define a guaranteed percentage of the shared pool for a user. This  model is good when you want predictable costs but don’t need full reservation. Pay-As-You-Go: No guaranteed resources, only consumption-based; ideal if usage is variable. The model is flexible and fits users who want to grow gradually. Reservation Pool: You reserve all available resources; user requests are limited only by what the provider’s data center can supply. Reservation Pool is suited for organizations that need fixed performance and large infrastructure. Useful Features of VMware Cloud Director Here are several powerful features that optimize resource usage, routing, and tenant isolation: Delegation of Privileges You can assign network administrators from the users of each organization. These admins get broad rights: they can create and manage VMs, deploy OVF/OVA templates, manage VM migration, set up isolated/routable networks, balance VM workloads, and more. Monitoring and Analytics Cloud Director includes a unified system for monitoring and analyzing VM infrastructure: VMs, storage, networks, memory. All data is logged and visualized in a dedicated dashboard, making it easier to detect and resolve problems proactively. Networking Features Networking in vCloud Director supports dynamic routing, distributed firewalls, hybrid cloud integration, and flexible traffic distribution. Many of these features are now standard in the newer versions of Cloud Director. If you don’t already have some of them, you may need to upgrade your NSX Edge and convert it to an Advanced Gateway in the UI. Dynamic routing improves reliability by eliminating manual route configuration. You can also define custom routing rules based on IP/MAC addresses or groups of servers. With NSX Edge load balancing, incoming traffic can be distributed evenly across pools of VMs selected by IP, improving scalability and performance. Access Control and More You can create custom user roles in the Cloud Director UI to control access tailored to organizational needs. VMs can be pinned to specific ESXi host groups (affinity rules), which helps with licensing or performance. If Distributed Resource Scheduler (DRS) is supported, Cloud Director can automatically balance VMs across hosts based on load. Additional useful features include automatic VM discovery and import, batch updating of server cluster cells, and network migration tools.
25 November 2025 · 5 min to read
Infrastructure

Why Developers Use the Cloud: Capabilities and Advantages

Today, up to 100% of startups begin operating based on providers offering services ranging from simple virtual hosting to dedicated servers. In this article, we will examine the advantages of cloud computing that have led to its dominance over the “classic” approach of having a dedicated server in a separate room. Cloud Use Cases Typical scenarios for using cloud technologies include: Full migration of a business application to a remote server. For example, enterprise resource planning or accounting software. These applications support operation via remote desktop interfaces, thin clients, or web browsers. Migration of specific business functions. Increasingly, archival copies are stored in the cloud while software continues running locally. Alternatively, a backup SQL server node can be hosted remotely and connected in case the local server fails. Implementation of new services. Businesses are increasingly adopting automated systems for data collection and analytics. For example, Business Intelligence (BI) technologies have become popular, helping generate current and comparative reports. Interaction between local and cloud environments. Hybrid services are well established in large networks. For example, a retail store may operate a local network with an on-site server, receive orders from an online store, and send requests back to transport companies, and so on.This setup allows offline operation even if the internet is fully disconnected: processing sales, receiving shipments, conducting inventories, with automatic synchronization once connectivity is restored. These examples represent foundational scenarios, giving developers plenty of room to innovate. This is one reason more and more coders are attracted to the cloud. Advantages Now let’s examine the advantages and disadvantages of cloud computing. Yes, the technology has some drawbacks, including dependency on internet bandwidth and somewhat higher requirements for IT specialists. Experienced professionals may need retraining, whereas younger personnel who learn cloud technologies from the start do not face such challenges. Speed Software development often requires significant time and effort for application testing. Applications must be verified across multiple platforms, resolutions, and device types. Maintaining local machines dedicated to testing is inefficient. Cloud computing solves this by enabling rapid deployment of virtually any environment, isolated from other projects, ensuring it does not interfere with team development. High deployment speed and access to cloud services also encourage IT startups to launch almost “from scratch,” with minimal resource investment. The advantages of cloud services are especially critical when development volumes periodically expand. Purchasing hardware consumes a developer’s most valuable resource: time. In the cloud, selecting a plan takes just a few minutes, and the setup of a remote host for specific tasks can begin immediately. Hardware resources on the remote server, such as CPU cores, memory, and storage, can also be easily adjusted. Security Building a private server is expensive. Besides the powerful machines, you will need backup power and internet lines, a separate room with air conditioning and fire protection, and security personnel to prevent unauthorized access. Cloud providers automatically provide all these features at any service level. Other security advantages include: Easier identity and access management (IAM). Higher reliability for continuous business operations. Protection against theft or seizure of storage devices containing sensitive data. On a cloud server, users cannot simply plug in a USB drive to download files. Data does not reside on local machines, and access is controlled according to company policy. Users only see what their role allows. This approach reduces the risk of viruses and accidental or intentional file deletion. Antivirus software runs on cloud platforms, and backups are automatically maintained. Cost Efficiency Purchasing server hardware is a major budget burden, even for large corporations. Before the cloud boom, this limited IT development. Modern developers often need test environments with unique infrastructure, which may only be required temporarily. Buying hardware for a one-time test is inefficient. Short-term rental of cloud infrastructure allows developers to complete tasks without worrying about hardware maintenance. Equipment costs directly impact project pricing and developer competitiveness, so cloud adoption is advantageous. Today, most software is developed for cloud infrastructure, at least with support for it. Maintenance, storage, and disposal costs for IT equipment also add up. Hardware becomes obsolete even if unused. This makes maintaining developer workstations for “simple” desktop software costly. Offloading this to a cloud provider allows developers to always work with the latest infrastructure. Convenience Another cloud advantage is ease of use. Cloud platforms simplify team collaboration and enable remote work. The platform is accessible from any device: desktop, laptop, tablet, or smartphone, allowing work from home, the office, or even a beach in Bali. Clouds have become a foundation for remote work, including project management. Other conveniences include: Easy client demonstrations: Developers can grant access and remotely show functionality, or run it on the client’s office computer without installing additional components. Quick deployment of standard solutions: Setting up an additional workstation takes only a few minutes, from registering a new user to their trial login. New developers can quickly join ongoing tasks. Easy role changes: In dynamic teams, personnel often switch between projects. Access to project folders can be revoked with a few clicks once a task is completed. This also applies to routine work: adding new employees, blocking access for former staff, or reassigning personnel. A single administrative console provides an overview of activity and simplifies version tracking, archiving, and rapid deployment during failures. Stability Another factor affecting developer success is the speed of task completion. Beyond rapid deployment, system stability is critical. On local machines, specialists depend on hardware reliability. A failure could delay project timelines due to hardware replacement and configuration. Moving software testing to the cloud enhances the stability of local IT resources, particularly in hybrid systems. Cloud data centers provide Tier 3 minimum reliability (99.982% uptime) without additional client investment. Resources are pre-provisioned and ready for use according to the chosen plan. Development, testing, and operation are typically conducted within a single provider’s platform, in an environment isolated from client services. Conclusion Cloud technologies offer numerous advantages with relatively few drawbacks. Businesses and individual users value these benefits, and developers are encouraged to follow trends and create new, in-demand products. Virtually all commerce has migrated to the cloud, and industrial sectors, especially those with extensive branch networks and remote facilities, are also adopting cloud solutions.
25 November 2025 · 6 min to read

Do you have questions,
comments, or concerns?

Our professionals are available to assist you at any moment,
whether you need help or are just unsure of where to start.
Email us
Hostman's Support