What Are The Best VPS Hosts? Top 8 Best VPS
Infrastructure
02.11.2021
10 min read
Share
In this article we will talk about VPS — powerful computers that hosting providers sell access to, so that developers, administrators, and webmasters around the world can create amazing apps and useful websites.
Let’s find out how the VPS works, how it is different from classic servers, and how to choose the best one. And at the end, we will discuss the best VPS hosts to use now.
What is a VPS hosting?
VPS stands for Virtual Private Server. In short, it is a special combination of software and hardware that lets developers and webmasters publish their websites and applications on the web.
This type of server is virtual because it is not a real computer but an isolated space on a powerful PC that is controlled via a program called a hypervisor and imitates a fully-fledged «machine». Even though it is intangible it lets you deploy applications and use whichever technology and utilities you want on your own server (you can even access BIOS and quickly change hardware characteristics).
For example, you might want to host a database on your VPS or launch a dynamically changing website. It is up to you how you set up your server. You just have to rent enough virtual power.
So a VPS is a server without the need to buy a real server.
Is VDS any different?
Yes and no. Overall, they are the same. VDS stands for Virtual Dedicated Server and dedicated in this case is similar to private. Both use hypervisors to control virtual hardware.
The difference sometimes lies in the technology of virtualization that is used on the server. Some users divide Virtual Private Server and Virtual Dedicated Server into two different camps, the OpenVZ virtualization and the KVM, VMWare virtualization.
The first one is much more flexible than the second one. It lets you change the hardware characteristics of the server on the go without shutting down the running site or application. But it only supports Linux and is not as secure as KVM and similar virtualization technologies.
KVM is different because it isolates your workspace more effectively, depriving the host and other users from accessing your data in any way. But you can’t change the virtual hardware set without rebooting the server (KVM seems to be closer to a real computer).
Benefits and disadvantages of VPS
VPS offers a relatively cheap and functional way of sending your site or app to the web. But like any complex software solution, it has its pros and cons.
-
This type of server is cheaper than dedicated servers and most cloud clusters.
-
It is easy to transfer all the data from one VPS to another. You don’t have to consider hardware-related issues. Everything is encapsulated into a virtualized block of data.
-
The hosting provider usually takes care of all the tech stuff.
-
VPS comes with a dedicated IP, Firewall, and other necessary components, distinguishing it from virtual hosting which is a cheaper and less functional solution.
On the other hand, you have less performance with a virtual server because you are sharing it with other users renting VPS at the same hosting. Also, even with root access, you have no impact on the hardware.
How to choose the best VPS hosting?
When choosing the VPS hosting consider these factors:
-
Type of operating system. It might be Linux or Windows Server. In most cases, Linux is an optimal solution but some services work best with Windows.
-
Virtual hardware should be powerful enough to run your app smoothly. Pay special attention to the storage volume so you don’t have to limit yourself.
-
Choose hosting that offers servers around the globe so every user on the planet can access your website or application without visible lags.
-
Good VPS hosting offers different features that simplify the process of creating the server. For example, an opportunity to deploy projects that are stored in git-system.
-
And the hosting itself should have a good reputation. It is important to choose one which is already used by some users and uses well-grounded data centers.
Top 8 best VPS
Here we will quickly observe the most popular hosting providers that are on the TOP right now.
Most of the apps have the same features so we will not discuss all of them. We will consider specific characteristics and note the cons of the servers if they are any.
This is one of the most popular and powerful VPS hosts at the moment. It tops a lot of ratings and is loved by many webmasters. The uptime of the InMotion is remarkably high — about 99.99%. It sports a qualified and proactive support team and flexible billing system.
InMotion hosting has many plans from the cheapest with 2 GB of RAM, 45 GB of space on SSD, and 2 CPUs to powerful machines with 8 CPUs and 8 GB of RAM. Every plan comes with unlimited bandwidth, free transfer from another hosting, and a control panel called cPanel.
There are many users of InMotion servers around the globe so you can be sure about the reputation of the host. InMotion VPS guarantees the security of your files stored on the server.
Of course, InMotion offers its users basic functionality like regular data backup, a free SSL certificate to assure data encryption, and many other necessary features.
Price: starting at $18 per month
Uptime: 99.99%
Hostman is the VPS hosting that offers unique virtual machines that are ready to work with specific tools and applications like databases, Webpack-projects, etc.
While most of the other VPS hosts give you an empty server that you must set up manually, Hostman lets you use your GitHub repository to deploy a fully-fledged and ready-to-run application in a few clicks. Immediately after connecting the repository.
Renting a Hostman server allows you to choose from the cheapest virtual machine with one 3.2 GHz CPU, 25GB SSD, and 1 GB of RAM to the most advanced with 8 processors, 16 GB of RAM, and 320GB of SSD.
It uses DigitalOcean, Amazon, and Azure as a backend, so you have an outstandingly reliable server with amazing uptime up to 100% with global data centers around the world.
You can also choose a pre-made server with installed MongoDB, Minecraft server, or any operating system you like (including Ubuntu, CentOS, FreeBSD, Debian).
And the best thing about Hostman is that it offers a 7-day free trial without functional limitations so you can try out all the features of the VPS and decide whether or not you should rent.
Price: starting at $5 per month
Uptime: 99.99%
It is a hosting provider that became popular because of the good balance between the price and the value it offers to server renters. You can choose a flexible plan that fits well with your unique requirements. You can even buy a plan with an administrator who will manage your site.
A2 works with different operating systems including Linux and Windows. But it has some pitfalls like the absence of a free domain on all the plans and less uptime.
Users describe the support team of the A2 hosting as friendly and skilled. So, by renting a server here you won't have to worry about the qualifications of people behind A2.
The second big potential drawback when using A2 is the limited amount of disk storage. The maximum you can get at A2 VPS hosting is 150 GB.
Price: starting at $40 per month
Uptime: 99.95%
A quite reliable server that is known for its extremely good uptime.
It is a fully functional VPS that delivers everything you would expect from this kind of software product. Developers usually use it for deploying web projects based on WordPress site builder. But in any case, it has the tools and services required to maintain a stable and powerful VPS.
Bluehost will please new users with the free domain it gives to everyone forever. You just need to rent any of the VPS’s offered on the official website of Bluehost hosting.
The reason you may not like this host is its limited storage. If you need to store an impressive number of files or a big database you will be a bit disappointed by the cap of 120 GB of SSD storage.
Additionally, the plan system is not as flexible as you would expect from hosting at this scale. You’d have to choose one of three options. But you might find it easy to decide which is best.
Price: starting at $19.99 per month
Uptime: 99.98%
This one is one of the cheapest VPS hosts for those who are creeating their first website or application. Hostgator offers massive discounts for starting plans to encourage you to rent their hardware.
Hostgator is well known for its flexible customization system that lets webmasters cherry-pick necessary components, tools, and services to create the server of their dream. Moreover, it boasts impressive reliability due to its state-of-the-art data centers.
The 45-day guarantee period may help you decide. If you’re not satisfied with the quality of the server a refund will be easy enough to get.
But you probably won’t be happy with a static amount of RAM and the same bandwidth for every plan. Also, Hostgator VPS hosting doesn’t deliver free bonuses such as a domain name or SSL certificate.
Price: starting at $20 per month
Uptime: 99.99%
Hostinger is a good choice for those who want to jump from shared hosting to a VPS mostly because of its reasonable prices and the ease of starting a new server.
The cheapness is the biggest advantage of Hostinger. The first plan is a bargain. You can get a decent server for the monthly price of an app in the App Store.
Unfortunately, there are several disadvantages that could put you off this hosting provider. Hostinger sports the lowest uptime around the VPS in this set (it’s unlikely to reach 99% and it might be the lowest number), it has no phone support and boasts only 800 GB bandwidth while most of its counterparts offer at least 1 TB. Furthermore, the support team here doesn’t work 24/7 so you can’t rely on it. They don’t always help, especially in critical situations.
Price: starting at $4 per month
Uptime: 99.90%
Liquid Web reviews usually tell us how this hosting offers balanced plans that are cheap and at the same time give enough hardware power to launch quite demanding applications.
One of the reasons to choose Liquid Web hosting is the large selection of control panels included.
Also, every plan comes with professional backup for more than a hundred gigs of data. There’s a good support team that might help with setting up the server for the first time and neutralizing any issues that appear while already utilizing a rented server over a given period.
Moreover, Liquid Web is good enough at protecting your VPS from DDoS attacks. And a highest data transferring speed is achieved owing to high-quality SSD.
Price: starting at $15 per month
Uptime: 99.99%
This is a contradictory VPS host. It is accessible and functional enough but has the biggest amount of restrictions. You have to think twice before renting a server here.
You might like it because DreamHost VPS offers you totally unlimited bandwidth, so you’ll never have to think about any limitation connected to data transfer speed.
But there are many disadvantages. First of all, there’s no live chat and phone support. To resolve any issue you’ll have to use email. That’s quite archaic and not especially useful. The second problem lies in the lack of root access. There isn’t the control you would have using other hosts. And the last thing that you probably won’t like is the lack of a money-back guarantee if you are unsatisfied with the server quality.
All things considered, we don’t really believe in their claim of 100% uptime.
Price: starting at $10 per month
Uptime: 100%
Conclusion
That’s it, you can try many VPS hosts and decide which is best. This list includes conservative and reliable solutions like A2 and modern and powerful ones like Hostman. The last gives you a chance to try all the features for free and quickly create your own project to test it out.
But if you want to try a different solution choose the one that gives you the advanced tools to secure your data and while providinng you with as much high uptime as possible.
Infrastructure
02.11.2021
10 min read
Share
Similar
Infrastructure
Microservices Architecture: What It Is, Who It’s For, and Tools to Use
Every developer strives to speed up product development while maintaining enough flexibility and confident control over the process. Microservices application architecture helps solve these tasks and, over the past 10 years, has begun actively competing with the traditional monolithic approach. To begin, let’s look at the difference between them.
Microservices Architecture vs. Monolith
The difference between these two software development approaches is easiest to illustrate with an example. Let’s imagine two online stores: one implemented as a monolith and the other as microservices.
A monolithic online store is a single, indivisible structure that combines all components: databases (catalog, customer data), shopping cart, order and payment forms. All of these elements are tightly interconnected and located on the same server.
In a microservices system, each component is an independent module that developers can work on separately. And naturally, nothing requires hosting these modules on a single server.
Thus, microservices architecture is a kind of constructor that allows you to add new elements painlessly as you scale the application. A monolith, on the other hand, can be compared to a solid wall: scaling here is only possible by adding another identical monolith.
It’s worth adding that microservices are sometimes mistakenly perceived as a set of very small services. This is not the case: for example, the database of a large online store may contain millions of records and occupy tens of gigabytes, yet still be just one of the modules within the microservices architecture of the whole application.
Comparing Microservices and Monoliths by Key Criteria
Now let’s look at the main characteristics of microservices technology in comparison with a monolith and see how both approaches solve the same developer tasks.
Release Cycles
Development speed and frequency of updates increase with microservices thanks to modularity: changes are made not to the entire codebase but to individual modules. With a monolith, however, the whole platform must be updated first, which increases testing and debugging time. As a result, development slows down and updates are released less frequently.
Technology Stack
The microservices model offers significantly greater flexibility because each service can be written in its own programming language and may use different libraries and data-storage technologies. With a monolith, the situation is different: changing the technology stack is nearly impossible. Developers are forced to stick to the initial tools.
Developer Onboarding
Each module in a microservices architecture is self-contained, making it possible to bring in programmers who are familiar with the functionality of a specific service. This substantially lowers the onboarding threshold. With a monolith, new developers must dive into the code of the entire application, understand the functions of every block, and only then begin productive work. Thus, maintaining a monolith is more dependent on specific team members.
Optimization Characteristics
The modularity of microservices architecture also positively affects optimization, since developers can optimize each service separately. Optimizing a monolithic structure is more difficult because the team must account for links between indivisible blocks, and updating any one of them inevitably affects the entire application.
Application Scalability
The distributed structure of microservices and their ability to run on separate servers make scaling fast and easy. In monoliths, scaling one component inevitably requires scaling the entire application as a whole.
Fault Tolerance
Because services are hosted on different servers and have a modular structure, microservices architecture achieves independence of each module. This significantly increases system resilience: a failure in one service does not cause the entire application to fail. With a monolith, the situation is different: all components are tightly interconnected, so the failure of one module can make the entire application inoperable.
Do I Need to Switch to Microservices Right Now?
As we’ve seen, microservices have advantages in many key areas. But does this mean you need to abandon monoliths as an outdated approach and immediately switch to microservices? The answer depends on the current state of your project. And let’s say right away: rushing to adopt microservices is not always the right choice. Distributed architecture also has its drawbacks.
First, microservices require ensuring network connectivity between modules. If a network connection is unstable, this leads to delays and data inconsistencies, which create potential problems in application behavior.
Second, each module of a microservices system requires separate testing and health monitoring. Additionally, you will need to allocate cloud resources for each module, which may increase costs.
Third, with the microservices approach, teams responsible for different modules may encounter interaction issues. This means you may need a connecting link in the form of DevOps specialists who can streamline collaboration and speed up development.
All the factors listed above allow us to conclude that the transition to microservices must be timely. Usually, during the early stages of a project, this is unnecessary, especially if developers have limited human or financial resources.
Switching to a microservices architecture makes sense when there is a clear need for significant scaling, and scaling a monolith has already become difficult. Microservices may be right for you if:
You have a large team. In this case, it makes sense to divide the team into separate, independent groups, each responsible for its own service;
You have a complex, branched application. In this case, it’s far more convenient to update and maintain modules separately than to rebalance the entire system each time;
Your application traffic is highly variable. For example, you see sharp spikes in load during certain periods. Microservices' distributed structure allows quick scaling during peak loads, after which you can easily return to normal capacity levels;
Your application is frequently updated. Working with separate modules in this scenario is much simpler, and new releases will be significantly faster.
If your project meets at least one of these criteria, this is a reason to consider breaking it into independent elements. However, if your application is relatively small and does not require frequent updates, it is reasonable not to rush away from monolithic architecture.
Useful Tools for Organizing Microservices
A modern development approach requires a containerization platform. In most cases, developers use Docker for these purposes. Docker tools allow them to isolate the application from the infrastructure, meaning they can work with it equally well locally or in the cloud, which is very convenient for development.
Once containers become numerous, an orchestrator becomes essential for managing and organizing groups of containers. Kubernetes is most commonly used as an orchestrator due to its strong compatibility with Docker.
Another necessary tool is a load balancer, which ensures even distribution of network traffic across all cloud resources. This significantly increases the application’s fault tolerance.
21 November 2025 · 6 min to read
Infrastructure
Serverless Architecture: Overview of Serverless Computing
Serverless is one of the popular directions in IT and continues to grow. Cloud providers are ready to provide all the necessary infrastructure and maintain it, and the user pays only for the execution time of a function—idle time is not billed.
Serverless Ecosystem
Serverless architecture is a way of building applications in which the developer writes the application logic, while the cloud provider is responsible for launching that logic, monitoring, scaling, maintaining the execution environment, and managing load planning. This is not always an external provider; such infrastructure can also be implemented inside a company using its own computing resources.
The simplification of working with infrastructure traces back to the appearance of the first IaaS (Infrastructure as a Service), where the provider simply offered virtual infrastructure for rent, and then extended to widespread BaaS (Backend as a Service), where a developer’s microservice or a database is simply several containers running in the provider’s environment, and in the case of a database, with preconfigured replication.
Another product is FaaS (Function as a Service), where the execution unit is a single function. In part, this resembles a microservices approach. Your function should not rely on state between calls (it must be stateless), because each call is launched by the provider as a separate instance in a container. There are also some limitations imposed by the cloud platform: not all programming languages can be used to write function code (although the list is usually wide), and there are limits on execution time and memory usage. The exact limits differ by platform and may depend on your pricing plan. Many providers offer trial periods from three months to a year with limits on the number of requests.
The foundation of Serverless is FaaS and the provider’s ecosystem of products. Typically, there are Databases, Authorization Services, API Gateways, Message Brokers (such as Kafka), all provided as services (BaaS) that your function can integrate with.
Architecture
Each provider may offer a unique set of services, but applications built on FaaS generally have similar architectures. As an example of integration between provider products, you can consider a TODO application (the example is taken from the AWS website).
The application logic is packaged in lambda functions, which interact with the DynamoDB database, provided by AWS as a separate service. In front of the functions is the API Gateway, which handles incoming requests and routes them appropriately. The architecture also includes the Amplify Console for managing the web interface of the application and the Amazon Cognito authentication service.
Advantages and Disadvantages
The main positive aspects of Serverless typically include:
Flexible scalability
Helps handle peak loads and rapid product growth. The provider will automatically scale the function, and when demand decreases, resource consumption will shrink.
Pricing
You pay only for the execution time of the function. For example, on AWS, the price includes the cost of function invocations and the amount of memory (GB/s) allocated during execution. Even with 24/7 availability (with some nuances), you do not pay for periods of inactivity.
Automation
CI/CD, integration with other services, monitoring, log management, and maintaining the execution environment—the provider handles all of this, allowing for faster product deployment.
Compared to BaaS infrastructure or full server control (VPS), deploying an application into cloud functions has its downsides:
Resource limits
Cloud functions have memory and execution time limits, as well as restrictions on data sizes sent or received. Here are examples of such limits in AWS.
Cold starts
The provider will not keep a container with your function running at all times. If the function has been idle for some time, its next invocation will require time to start up. Startup time depends on the programming language, code size, and the provider’s internal processes, and can reach up to 10 seconds. Here’s a small article with examples on the topic, and a GitHub repo with code and research results.
Best Practices
Although FaaS-based systems and service ecosystems resemble microservice architecture and functional programming, they have their own best practices beyond monitoring, logging, request tracing, and mocking service responses.
Warm Start
If your application requires consistently fast responses, cold starts can be a major issue. The solution is to constantly “warm up” the function, for example, by periodically sending requests that create some load so the provider keeps the function active. The load itself does not matter; what matters is triggering the function. If necessary, the provider will scale by starting additional instances on the fly. Some providers offer built-in mechanisms for this (e.g., AWS), allowing you to keep a certain number of instances always running.
Fan-Out Pattern
A pattern that allows you to bypass memory, data size, and execution time limits by splitting a large task into smaller chunks. Downloading and processing data in chunks, sending emails in small batches—cloud functions will execute tasks in parallel across different function instances. The trade-off is more complex application code and paying for more function invocations.
Event Driven Pattern
Cloud FaaS functions can be triggered not only via API Gateway or direct invocation. A trigger can be an event from any integrated service, such as a message from Kafka. Event-driven code organization works extremely well for FaaS.
Cost Optimization
Unlike a fixed-price service (e.g., renting a VPS for a year), Serverless costs are composed of several different services, each with its own billing model. Continuous monitoring of costs and resource utilization, along with load planning, is key to reducing infrastructure expenses. Some providers have special offerings, such as AWS Lambda Reserved Concurrency, which allows reserving Lambda instances and keeping them active on a cheaper pricing tier.
Tools for Working with Serverless
Serverless Framework
An open-source tool for simplifying the development, deployment, and management of serverless applications. It allows developers to focus on writing code without worrying about infrastructure and provider configuration. It supports AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, IBM Cloud, Oracle Cloud. It enables local function testing, integrates with CI/CD systems like Jenkins or Travis, has a large plugin ecosystem, and allows developers to create their own plugins.
Terraform
A HashiCorp tool representing the "infrastructure as code" approach. It allows defining infrastructure using configuration files in HCL (HashiCorp Configuration Language), which describe the desired infrastructure state rather than the steps to achieve it. Like Serverless Framework, Terraform supports many major cloud providers and allows defining modules, i.e., reusable sets of configuration files for creating and managing infrastructure components.
AWS SAM
The Serverless Application Model is an open framework created by AWS for developing, testing, and deploying serverless applications on AWS. SAM provides a simplified way to build serverless apps based on CloudFormation, AWS’s main tool for infrastructure as code.
Kubeless
Unlike the previous tools that focus on cloud providers, Kubeless is a serverless framework for Kubernetes. It allows creating and managing serverless functions directly inside your Kubernetes cluster. It works with standard Kubernetes objects like Deployments, Services, Ingress, etc. It provides scaling and fault tolerance for functions, has a CLI, and integrates with the Kubernetes ecosystem.
OpenFaaS
An open-source serverless framework. It allows creating functions in many programming languages, including Python, Node.js, Go, Ruby, Java, and others. It supports scaling and ensures fault tolerance. OpenFaaS integrates with Kubernetes and Docker Swarm.
Areas of Application
Today, Serverless applications cover a wide range of tasks, from notification and mailing services to analytics platforms, data stream processing, webhooks, game servers, file and multimedia processing, IoT applications, adapters for external services, monitoring and logging systems, business process automation, content rendering servers, customer support chatbots, and testing or deployment servers. Many examples exist within the Serverless Framework ecosystem.
Major IT companies are migrating some processes to Serverless. For example:
Netflix uses FaaS for encoding and transcoding video when preparing video streams for different devices.
Airbnb uses Serverless in its StreamAlert system for real-time data analysis.
Using Serverless is not only a way to reduce infrastructure costs, but also a tool for increasing development efficiency and flexibility. Serverless allows for rapid development and deployment of new functions and applications, as well as scaling them based on business needs.
Additionally, Serverless technologies support creating more reliable and fault-tolerant applications because cloud providers ensure high availability and automatic scaling. This helps companies avoid downtime or service failures that could harm their reputation and customer experience.
Development of Serverless
Serverless architecture represents a significant step in the evolution of cloud computing, allowing companies to focus on application development without worrying about managing infrastructure. This approach brings flexibility, scalability, and efficiency to development processes while reducing maintenance and operational costs.
In the future, we can expect development in several areas:
Greater integration and compatibility between cloud providers, allowing users to choose the best solution without vendor lock-in.
New services and tools tailored for Serverless architectures, such as advanced tools for monitoring, performance optimization, security, and expanded development and deployment capabilities.
Growing adoption among companies, increasing the market’s growth and expanding opportunities for innovations and new business models.
Serverless technologies are poised to continue reshaping the landscape of cloud computing, enabling companies to focus on building applications rather than managing infrastructure. With more integrations, new tools, and broader adoption, Serverless will increasingly become a key element in the modern developer’s toolkit.
20 November 2025 · 9 min to read
Infrastructure
How to Choose a Cloud Provider: Checklist
A cloud hosting provider is a company that offers users virtual resources for remote infrastructure management and application deployment.
Unlike traditional web hosting, cloud-based service providers allow for flexible configuration of rented resources, helping clients save on hardware, software, and system administration costs.
In this article, we’ll review the key factors to consider when choosing a cloud hosting provider, starting with the core services these companies offer.
Provided Services
There are three main service models that cloud hosting companies typically offer. Ideally, a reliable provider should support all three:
IaaS (Infrastructure as a Service): Basic infrastructure resources such as virtual servers, networks, and storage.
PaaS (Platform as a Service): Software platforms for various tasks: database management, big data analytics, containerized app development, machine learning systems, and more.
SaaS (Software as a Service): Fully managed software solutions that run on the provider’s infrastructure, reducing the load on the client’s computer or mobile device.
Key features offered by best cloud providers include:
A firewall to protect against DDoS attacks and malware.
Automated backups with redundant data storage across multiple locations for disaster recovery.
Data encryption to ensure confidentiality; even provider staff cannot access your information.
Pricing
When evaluating pricing, focus not just on the base rate but on what’s included in the package.
Some providers attract customers with low prices, but cheaper plans often come with limited resources or features.
For instance:
Low-cost plans may not suit clients who handle large data volumes due to disk space limits or slow storage performance.
Some providers may offer a “cheap” cloud server but fail to mention that your virtual resources are shared with other clients, reducing performance.
Keep in mind: a high-performance server cannot be truly cheap.
Company Experience
As a rule, the longer a provider has been in the cloud hosting business, the more reliable it tends to be. However, reputation also matters: look for verified online reviews rather than marketing claims.
If a provider has been operating for over 5 years and maintains a solid reputation, it’s usually a trustworthy choice. A broad range of services is also a good indicator of expertise.
Certification and Standards
A strong advantage is certification under ISO 27001, the international standard for information security management.
While not legally required, it shows that the company has a well-structured approach to security: defined access levels, regular internal and external audits, and continuous process improvement.
Free Trial Period
A trial period can significantly influence a provider’s credibility.
If a provider offers 5–10 days (not just a day or two) for testing, it’s a positive sign that they’re confident in the quality of their services.
Hardware
Pay attention to the performance of CPUs and disk subsystems.
Ideally, a provider should offer configurations for different needs, from entry-level setups to high-performance solutions using modern server-grade processors and NVMe drives, which significantly outperform traditional SSDs in speed and reliability.
Reliability and SLA
A reliable provider must guarantee service uptime in its Service Level Agreement (SLA), typically expressed as a minimum annual availability percentage.
The SLA should also guarantee that you receive the computing power and software specified in your plan and that you can modify configurations, add or remove resources, and perform other key management tasks.
Data Center Location
Providers often advertise the geographic location of their servers as an advantage, but the data center’s certification level is far more important.
Look for certification under Tier III, which represents the optimal reliability level (Tier I being the lowest and Tier IV the highest and most expensive).
Tier III data centers can perform maintenance without downtime thanks to redundant infrastructure components.
Technical Support
The quality of technical support is a key differentiator.
Pay attention to:
Response time. It should be clearly stated in your contract.
Willingness to help with tasks like auditing or migrating infrastructure from other services.
Professionalism and courtesy—hallmarks of a customer-oriented provider.
Contract Termination
Even with the best cloud hosting provider, circumstances may change. Before signing up, check:
How and when you can retrieve your data.
How the provider destroys virtual machines and ensures complete data deletion upon termination.
Checklist: Choosing a Cloud Hosting Provider
Before making your decision, verify that your provider offers:
Support for IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS models with additional features.
Flexible, well-priced service packages.
5+ years of experience in the market.
(Optional) ISO 27001 certification.
A 5–10 day trial period for testing.
Multiple hardware configurations with scalable performance.
SLA-backed uptime guarantees and resource reliability.
A Tier III–certified data center.
Qualified, responsive technical support.
A secure and transparent contract termination process.
19 November 2025 · 5 min to read
Do you have questions,
comments, or concerns?
Our professionals are available to assist you at any moment,
whether you need help or are just unsure of where to start.
whether you need help or are just unsure of where to start.
